For purposes of manuscript review, only the much less exacting Minimum Standard need be met. The requirements of Journal Style are not imposed on authors until a paper has been conditionally accepted for publication (unconditional acceptance will follow on submission of a final manuscript that conforms to journal style). There are guidelines concerning the technical requirements for the final manuscript files, as well as requirements on content and style. In October 2026, the AJP made a change to its journal style and authors of manuscripts accepted after that date should only follow the guidance below.
Please follow these instructions carefully; much grief can be avoided during the production process if authors prepare their manuscripts well. It also minimizes the lag between acceptance and the appearance of your finished article online and in print.
The editorial office copyedits all accepted manuscripts after final submission before typesetting. Where not inconsistent with other advice on this page, the AJP follows the Australian Government Style Manual. Authors are not expected to ensure their manuscript conforms to these standards in every detail; that is the job of the production team. Authors must accept copyedits made in accordance with the style guide at proof stage, even if the edits made diverge from your personal preference.
However, we do expect authors to ensure their final submitted manuscript complies with the following key requirements. A coherent journal style is important to us in producing a consistent reading experience from article to article. Please ensure too that the overall structure of your manuscript has all needed components.
Please keep formatting and styling to the minimum needed—you are producing input to the production process, not properly typeset output. Keep style semantic where possible (i.e., apply a style to a piece of text in virtue of its functional role, not what it looks like).
Authors must avoid using terms that discriminate on the basis of a person’s race, ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual identity, disability status or age. Use singular they as a generic gender-neutral pronoun, and respect the pronouns of anyone you are writing about. Avoid gender-specific titles in favour of neutral alternatives such as chairperson/chair or flight attendant.
The AJP's readership is culturally and linguistically diverse, and authors should be mindful of that diversity when writing. The use of technical terms and expressions that may be unfamiliar to most competent readers of English is sometimes unavoidable in philosophical writing, but deliberate obscurity in choice of vocabulary or syntax should be avoided. A sturdy and plain style, avoiding unnecessarily ornamental constructions, is generally preferred for effective philosophical communication. Self-consciously ‘literary’ affectations should be avoided.
A final manuscript must be supplied in a format which the editorial office and our publisher’s typesetters can handle. At present that means all final accepted submissions must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document in .docx or .doc format. Authors who have written their original submission in LaTeX or some other format must convert their document to Word format before final acceptance can occur. We recommend using Pandoc for this task. The conversion works best with ‘vanilla’ LaTeX, so try not to rely on recherché packages in producing your manuscript. While LaTeX has sophisticated typesetting capabilities, our workflow means anything that cannot be represented in Word should not be included as it will not render correctly if at all in the typeset published article. Unfortunately the editorial office cannot provide technical support for Pandoc.
For the convenience of authors, the AJP imposes only fairly modest formatting requirements at the point of acceptance. To make things easier for the production team, your final accepted manuscript must use no styles or formatting beyond the minimum needed to structure and present your manuscript. Please do be sure to format section headings and sub-headings, lists, tables, and equations using Word's built-in tools. You may use Word's built-in numbering and cross reference features, but note all internal links and dynamic numbering should be stripped at the point of final submission and replaced with their content (the easiest way to remove these from a Word document is to use Word’s ‘unlink fields’ command: select the entire document using Ctrl+A [Mac: ⌘A] and then press Ctrl+Shift+F9 [Mac: ⌘6] to replace fields with their contents).
Submitted documents should be self-contained, with the exception of figures (see below for more information on figures). This includes tables, which should be prepared using built-in tools and incorporated in your document. Each figure and table must have a caption and be numbered in order of appearance; note that figures and tables are numbered separately, so that for example the first table following Figure 1 will be Table 1. Figures and tables will be typeset as 'floats' to ensure efficient usage of page space, and so they must be referred to by number.
Please do make use of equations/math(s) mode for any mathematics—even single variables in text. Equations may but need not be labelled.
Bibliographical information is to be supplied in the correct format (Chicago author-date 18th edition). If you wisely make use of an external reference manager to manage your bibliographic matter in Word, the resulting formatted references must be supplied in your main document to the editorial office without dependencies on external databases and without embedded field codes (again, the easiest way to remove these from a Word document is to use Word’s ‘unlink fields’ command). The AJP recommends authors use a system, such as Zotero or Mendeley, that can understand 'Citation Style Language' and can produce, from accurate metadata, an accurate bibliography: we encourage using the journal's preferred style from the Zotero repository.
For purposes of comparison, please supply with your final manuscript a .pdf rendition that shows your intentions for any potentially tricky issues of typesetting. We may not be willing or able to reproduce your intended typesetting exactly, but it is an important guide for us in resolving any difficulties that emerge during copyediting and proofing.
Figures—diagrams, images, and other non-text elements—can be embedded in the manuscript file to indicate roughly where they should appear. Figure captions should be brief but descriptive. In multi-part figures, each part should be labelled (e.g. ‘Figure 1(a)’, ‘Figure 1(b)’).
Please also provide each figure as a separate image file. Provide high quality and high resolution files for your figures. Indicative resolutions that produce acceptable output:
Note: figures and diagrams will be rendered in greyscale in print; we recommend minimal use of colour to ensure that figures and diagrams remain legible and comprehensible.
The publisher provides more information on how to prepare artwork. Image file names should be aligned to the figure numbering: e.g. Figure1.tiff, Figure2a.eps.
Authors may take the structure of recent articles in the printed version of the Journal as a rough guide.
The following general pattern must be followed in production of your final submission:

Please ensure that the content of your manuscript complies with the key checklist for authors.
The foregoing does not apply to book reviews and book notes, which should not be divided into sections and should omit much of the other apparatus of an article.
A book review/note should be titled with the book under review, in the following format:
Author Forename Surname, Book Title: Subtitle, Publisher, Year of publication, pp. length in pages (including any frontmatter), price with currency (format), ISBN.
Sara Protasi, The Philosophy of Envy, Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. xv + 247, AUD141.95 (hardback), ISBN 9781316519172.
The body of the review should follow the title, following standard journal conventions. The one exception is that the book under review should be cited by page number or chapter number alone. Quotations from the book under review should be followed by the page number in parentheses following the quoted material; omit ‘p.’ or ‘pp.’. You may refer to chapters or sections in the book as follows: ‘In chapter 3, X argues…’; ‘The central argument of the book appears in chapters 2–4’; ‘X makes much of this observation (§3.2)’, and so on.
The review should conclude with a block of author details in this format:
Jeanette KennettIf there are multiple authors, please include multiple author blocks in this format.
Macquarie University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0879-3215
If needed include a section of 'References' after the author block. The book under review should not appear in the list of references. Book notes cannot have references.