Innovation in Inclusive Curricula Prize

Sponsored by Taylor and Francis.

Awarded for the development of innovative approaches to teaching philosophy.


Submissions: NOW OPEN

More information about the prize, judging criteria & how to enter

2024 Winner



Daryl Ooi


National University of Singapore

PH4213HM Comparative Philosophy

Curriculum

Teaching documents

Daryl Ooi’s course on Comparative Philosophy challenges traditional notions of what constitutes philosophical inquiry by introducing students to diverse methodologies and perspectives. The syllabus is comprehensive, with an impressive range of non-Western philosophical texts and supplementary readings. As attested by unit and teacher evaluations, Ooi was able to foster a safe and inclusive environment, encouraging high participation. Overall, Ooi's course stands out for its innovation in content, pedagogy, and design.

2023 Winner


Nick Munn

University of Waikato

Environmental Ethics

nickmunn.com/courses

Nick Munn’s Environmental Ethics course aims “to make Philosophy as a discipline more appealing to those who had not previously considered it”. The student feedback reflects success in this goal, with glowing reviews of the course content, structure and teachers. The design philosophy for this course was focused on the centrality of Mātauranga Māori to the practice of environmental ethics in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Indigenous knowledges are treated as equal to other sources of knowledge about environmental ethics. The Diversity Committee also commends Dr Munn for supporting students with disabilities to complete the course. Integrating diverse perspectives in the design of the materials, rather than as an add on which is limited to a specific week, broadens a wide range of students’ perspectives of philosophy and works to mainstream indigenous philosophies. The Committee congratulate Dr Munn for the design and delivery of a course that increases participation and understanding of diversity in philosophy.


2023 Commendation


Chong-Ming Lim

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Ethics and Public Policy


2022 Winner


Sam Shpall

University of Sydney

Philosophy & Literature (PHIL2646)

sydney.edu.au/arts/about/our-people/academic-staff/sam-shpall

Dr Shpall’s course promotes diversity through its engagement with various philosophies and ideas, especially from South America, highlighting some traditionally underrepresented groups in typical courses taught in our region. The course is highly interdisciplinary which is to be commended in efforts to encourage more diversity in participation. Dr Shpall’s teaching award as well as syllabus speak well for him as an excellent educator, with glowing reviews from students who participated in this course. We congratulate Dr Shpall for broadening representation of minority voices and creating an evidently highly engaging and enjoyable experience through his course.

Course Outline

2021 Winner


Rachael Brown

Australian National University

Science in Society: Ethics, Public Policy and Scientific Practice

It can be a challenge to make a philosophy course attractive to non philosophy majors. Brown’s course, which emphasizes the relevance of philosophy to science and public policy, was able to successfully appeal to a broad range of students from HASS and STEM disciplines at the Australian National University. Using classical and non-traditional resources such as public philosophy and media, Brown’s curriculum tackles historical and contemporary ethical dilemmas, framed along the lines of injustice and social relevance. 

The course brings attention to disparities in participation and platformed diverse voices in both science and philosophy. It is accessible to students with a range of backgrounds and it encourages them to think broadly about science and philosophy. Peer review and feedback ensure that students remain engaged and accountable to each other. Outstanding student evaluations from both times the course has been taught evidence its high quality.

The delivery and assessment respond to student needs and is supported by research on education and learning. The panel commends the lecturer for taking on the extra assessment tasks for effective learning. This is real dedication! 

Course Outline

2021 Highly Commended

Claudio Mazzola

University of Queensland


Deborah Brown

University of Queensland


Peter Ellerton

University of Queensland

Effective Thinking and WritingUQ Critical Thinking Project

2020 Winner


Ten-Herng Lai 

Australian National University

Advanced Topics in Philosophy: Disobedience, Dissent, Resistance, and Rebellion

Ten-Herng Lai’s richly interactive course begins by centring the values and experiences of students, and then brings their experiences into conversation with a diverse range of philosophical perspectives and voices. In doing so, the course creates space for abstract theorising to engage with culturally mediated embodied experience. Not only does the course reflect the literature on issues such as disobedience, resistance, and Rebellion as it is – drawing on a wide range of scholars and activists – but the course ensures that students are aware of the range of voices that we find within philosophy itself. What’s more, by weaving a range of local and global insights together, the course not only showcases the significance of global voices for local change, but also the relevance of local challenges (drawing from Australasia for instance) for charting global change as well. Lai’s engaging and ‘open-access’ style showcases the practice of philosophy in ways that cultivate a culture of inclusion, epistemic humility, and critical reflection.

Course Outline

2019 Winner


Helen Ngo

Deakin University

Justice and Equality

deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/people/helen-ngo

The judging panel unanimously decided to award the Prize for Innovation in Inclusive Curricula to Helen Ngo for her unit Justice and Equality. The first half of the unit focuses on grounding the students with a knowledge of the key movements in contemporary political philosophy, including utilitarianism, Rawlsian liberalism, libertarianism, Marxism, and communitarianism. In the second half the focus turns to racism, decolonial justice, feminism, transgender identities, and disability.

Rather than looking at these topics in isolation from the philosophical movements explored in the first half of the unit, Ngo links the new topics to political philosophy as traditionally conceived. For instance, Marxism is connected to decolonial justice through the work of Frantz Fanon; Rawlsian liberalism is discussed in relation to racism through the work of Charles Mills. The new topics are also discussed in relation to each other. For example, the week on transgender identities is related back to the week on feminism, and the tensions between feminist and transgender activism are explored, as are the possibilities for trans-feminist solidarity.

Ngo has radically altered the unit from previous years, assigning authors from a variety of underrepresented and marginalised groups. The unit also encourages the students to engage with real-world issues that are traditionally overlooked in undergraduate units in political philosophy. Ngo makes the case that these issues can both illuminate and pose serious challenges to existing political theories. Her unit is an excellent example of how to design a philosophy course that encourages diversity and inclusivity.

2018 Highly Commended


Sam Shpall 

University of Sydney

2017 Winner


Alexandre Lefebvre 

University of Sydney

The Philosophy of Human Rights

The course promotes inclusivity through careful attention to the authors represented within its curriculum, thus presenting to students a clear sense in which those engaged in important philosophical work can be from diverse backgrounds. This representation of diversity in philosophy is also carried through into the teaching team for the course, which displays a carefully managed gender balance. Finally, the course makes use of alternative methods of teaching, especially in tutorials, where inquiry and interaction are nurtured in an inquisitorial and collaborative learning space, thus supporting diverse styles of engagement. The judging panel found the course to be a high quality example of how to improve inclusiveness in the teaching of philosophy.

Course Outline

2016 Winner


Ruth Boeker

University of Melbourne 

History of Early Modern Philosophy

The prize's winner is Ruth Boeker's course History of Early Modern Philosophy  (University of Melbourne). The course innovates with respect to a standard course in early modern philosophy both in its content and in its pedagogy: it focuses on the collaborative aspect of philosophy during the early modern period; and it mirrors that collaboration in team-based pedagogy within the course.

These innovations cultivate inclusiveness, not by diluting the challenge of the curriculum but by intensifying students' engagement. The course materials undermine the myth of the solitary male philosophical genius, instead underscoring the interaction of voices, including female voices, in a common philosophical conversation during the early modern period. The carefully planned pedagogical structure cultivates students taking an active role in creating a supportive learning environment for themselves and their peers within their teams. And finally, the continuous low-stakes assessment sustains engagement and builds skills, thereby preventing students being left behind.

The judging panel found the course overall to be of high quality and an excellent contribution to improving inclusiveness within the teaching of philosophy. 

If you would like to receive more information about the course please contact 

Ruth Boeker:  shaps.unimelb.edu.au/about/staff/dr-ruth-boeker

Helpful TBL Resources

Boeker task design and sample materials

Boeker Course Outline and Design

2014 Winner


Michelle Sowey

Director, The Philosophy Club

The Big Questions Philosophy Mentoring Program

The judging panel unanimously decided to award the prize to The Big Questions philosophy mentoring program, submitted by Michelle Sowey, director of Melbourne-based organisation The Philosophy Club. This program has a two part structure in which: i) a cohort of undergraduate philosophy “mentors” are trained to facilitate collaborative philosophical inquiry amongst children, drawing on the “Philosophy for Children” model which has intellectual roots in American pragmatism. They are then placed in a low socio-economic status primary school setting where they facilitate philosophical inquiry with the children, with appropriate support, ii) the children receive an exposure to philosophical thought which is currently rare amongst low socio-economic status groups in Australasia, who typically do not reach University-level study.
The judging panel were impressed by the unique experiential learning in both philosophical practice and teaching which this program made possible, and by evidence that it achieved its aims of both broadening mentor’s philosophical practice and introducing our discipline to sectors of society that would not ordinarily encounter it. Although the program’s structure is unusual, the judges took into consideration that an important function of this prize is to encourage flexible thinking around the training of future philosophers. In her application Michelle argues that programs such as The Big Questions could play an important role in improving retention in our profession for individuals who are uncomfortable with a certain perceived combativeness in some aspects of its current culture, and instinctively prefer a more cooperative and collaborative model of philosophising. This claim seems worthy of further investigation.


Big Questions program aims, structure and scope, and program outline pdf
Big Questions Sample curriculum materials pdf 
Big Questions - how academic philosophers can get involved docx


The Australasian Association of Philosophy offers an annual prize of for the development of innovative approaches to teaching philosophy. This is offered with a view to exploring ways in which undergraduate courses in philosophy can build the understanding and practise of an inclusive discipline, concerned to foster equal participation in the profession. The aims of the prize are to encourage professionals developing and improving their teaching portfolios to consider critically how philosophy is presented, and to be innovative in implementing practices of teaching that off-set well-known disparities of participation in the discipline, for instance along race and gender lines. 

Judging Criteria

1. Significant innovation in curriculum that successfully promotes equity and diversity within the discipline, particularly with respect to underrepresented or marginalised groups in the profession, including those that undertake to decolonise and/or Indigenise philosophy curricula and/or

2. Innovation in pedagogy that successfully promotes broader participation in the discipline and/or

3. Adoption of strategies for engaging with real-world issues and justice in the classroom and/or

4. High quality in course design and delivery framed by the concern that philosophical education is also educating agency for valuing human diversity beyond the discipline and the classroom.

Resources for developing inclusive curriculum 

Eligibility

The prize is open to individuals, or groups of individuals, teaching undergraduate philosophy courses in Australasian Universities.

The course must have taken place within 5 years before the date of application. The course convenor should be included amongst the applicants, unless prior approval is given to waive this requirement.

No person may win the prize more than once, and no course may be re-entered without substantial modifications..

Submission deadline: 7 March 2025 8pm AEDT

Submit your entry HERE

Full details on Policy & Procedure can be found HERE (Requires Member Login)

This prize requires the collection of personal information. The way this personal information is used and distributed is detailed in the AAP Privacy Policy which can be found HERE. The AAP Privacy Policy forms part of the terms and conditions of this prize. By submitting a nomination, an applicant agrees to the usage of personal information as defined in the AAP Privacy Policy. Those nominating a third party for the prize should pay special attention to their obligation in notifying the third party of the usage and disclosure of their information as defined in the AAP Privacy Policy.

All enquiries to: admin@aap.org.au



©Australasian Association of Philosophy
ACN 152 892 272 ABN 29 152 892 272
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software