Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Editorial Policy


Types of Contributions

Unsolicited Contributions

  • AJP will publish contributions of high quality in any area of philosophy. The Journal welcomes unsolicited contributions of two types: Articles and Discussion Notes, as follows.

  • (1) ARTICLES are at least 4500 words long. They are also normally no longer than 8,000 words (in each case, including notes and bibliography). Longer pieces of exceptional significance will be considered, up to a maximum length of 15,000 words (still including notes and bibliography). Please note, however, that once a paper is longer than 8,000 words the standard required for acceptance rises; and it continues doing so, the longer the paper is beyond that norm of 8000 words. So, for example, a 10,000 word paper needs to be better than an 8,000 paper, all else being equal, if it is to be accepted by AJP. And a 12,000 word paper needs to be even better still.

  • (2) DISCUSSION NOTES are normally no longer than 3,000 words (including notes and bibliography), and they are subject to the same rule about increasing length. They must engage with articles recently published in the Journal.

  • Both for articles and for discussion notes, any refereeing will be double-blind, as described in the Editorial Procedures.

  • The Journal will not consider more than one submission at the same time from a given author (including when the author is a co-author). Authors must note that, if they have received a 'revise-and-resubmit' verdict from the Editor on one paper, then that paper, for the Journal's purposes, counts as still under consideration until the notified period for resubmission has run out. If an author wishes to submit a new paper after having received a 'revise-and-resubmit' verdict and before the resubmission period has passed, the earlier paper must be formally withdrawn before the newer one will be considered.

  • With effect from 1st January 2014, and because of the pressure of submissions, the Journal will not consider more than two submissions from any one author in any given twelve month period. This limit includes co-authored papers, but excludes revisions.

  • The Journal considers all manuscripts on the strict condition that they have not been published in whole or substantial part already, and that they are not under consideration for publication or in press elsewhere.

  • The Journal will not consider Articles or Discussion Notes whose primary focus is the criticism of papers not previously (and recently) published in the Journal. Neither will it consider Articles/Discussion Notes which are, in effect, a kind of Critical Notice of a single author.

  • Apart from Discussion Notes of the sort already described, the Journal will not consider very short papers (for example, of the kind or length published by Analysis and Thought). So, as mentioned above, the minimum length for an Article is 4,500 words (including notes and bibliography).

  • The Journal will not consider proposals for special issues devoted to conference (including workshop) proceedings. (This does not preclude the Journal's publication of occasional special issues based on calls for papers.)

  • The Journal is willing to consider submissions from organizers of symposia (of, say, two or three closely-related papers), provided that, in each case, the organizer has thoroughly 'pre-vetted' the papers. Written permission of individual authors for a joint submission of their work must be obtained and forwarded to the Editor. In such a case, the symposium's contents would be reviewed en bloc but otherwise in the usual way, and referees may be asked to comment on the merits both of individual papers and of the symposium as a whole. Notwithstanding the joint submission of the papers, the Editor reserves the right to reject one or more papers from those submitted, or to reject the symposium but to accept one or more of the papers which formed part(s) of it.

  • Even if submission of a paper has been suggested by persons associated with the Journal, including members of the Editorial Team themselves, all pieces submitted as Articles or Discussion Notes are treated as Unsolicited Contributions and double-blind refereed in accordance with the Editorial Procedures.

  • The Editor reserves the right not to proceed with publication of "accepted" submissions where the author does not supply a final version in conformity with Journal style.

Solicited Contributions

  • The Journal will solicit contributions of three types: Critical Notices and Discussions, Book Reviews, and Book Notes (brief reviews). One of the Book Review Editors will normally initiate the review process, but individuals are welcome to make contact with the Journal so as to nominate themselves as reviewers. No book reviews, book notes, or critical notices are to be submitted without a prior invitation from a Book Review Editor.

  • There is no guarantee of review of any given book, even if a copy is supplied. While we review books from all over the world, we make a special effort (although we do not promise) to cover books authored or edited by philosophers resident in Australasia, provided that the Journal is sent a copy.

  • Book Reviews are to be between 1500 and 1800 words; Book Notes are to be no longer than 400 words. Neither Book Reviews nor Book Notes may include notes. Sometimes, a short bibliography is needed in a Book Review but never in a Book Note. (If a citation is needed within an AJP Book Note -- a combination that is, we stress, rare -- the details must appear in the body of the Note.) Book Reviews and Book Notes are to be submitted in doc/docx format, not pdf format. Reviews and Book Notes will not be externally refereed, but a Book Review Editor and/or the Editor may require changes to a Book Review or Book Note before it is to be published.

  • Critical Notices and Critical Discussions will be of important works in philosophy, and will be commissioned by the Editor. They will normally not exceed 5,000 words (including notes and bibliography), and be anonymously refereed. Members of the Editorial Board may, from time to time, make recommendations to the Editorial Team of books which might deserve a Critical Notice.

  • The Editor reserves the right not to proceed with publication of "accepted" submissions where the author does not supply a final version in conformity with Journal Style.


Feedback to Authors

While there can be no guarantee which applies to every individual case, it is editorial policy to provide authors with timely decisions and helpful comments.


Publication Priorities

The Editor decides the order of appearance of accepted submissions. Priority may be given to Discussion Notes. In these cases, authors of the materials being commented on might be offered a right of reply (subject to the usual refereeing), on the understanding that timely publication of the Note will take priority over the desirability of including both Note and Reply in the same issue of the Journal.

The current balance of the Journal's contents is not prescriptive.

 


©Australasian Association of Philosophy
ACN 152 892 272
ABN 29
152 892 272
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software